Wrongful Dismissal in Singapore: What Every Employee and Employer

Wrongful Dismissal in Singapore: What Every Employee and Employer Needs to Know in 2026

By the Employment Law Practice, Quahe Woo & Palmer LLC

The phrase "wrongful dismissal" is commonly misunderstood in Singapore, partly because it has picked up baggage from foreign legal culture. Employees who have watched American workplace dramas tend to assume that any termination that feels arbitrary or harsh gives them a cause of action. In-house HR managers reading international employment-law commentary sometimes assume Singapore has the same broad "unfair termination" concept. It does not. Singapore's framework is narrower, structured around statute, and the passing of the Workplace Fairness Act in 2025 has added a statutory discrimination overlay on top of existing protections. Understanding where the lines fall matters — both for employers managing compliance risk and for employees who may have genuine grounds to challenge a termination.

Photo by Erik Mclean on Pexels

What Wrongful Dismissal Actually Means Under Singapore Law

Under the Employment Act, a dismissal is wrongful in a relatively confined set of circumstances. The primary grounds are:

1. Termination without required notice — where the employer fails to give the notice stipulated in the contract or, where the contract is silent, the statutory minimums under Section 10 of the Employment Act (ranging from one day to four weeks depending on length of service).

2. Termination for misconduct without sufficient cause — or without following a proper investigation process, where the contract or the Employment Act requires due process before summary dismissal can be validly effected.

3. Discriminatory dismissal on a ground protected by the Workplace Fairness Act — once the relevant provisions are operative, terminations on grounds including age, race, gender, religion, marital status, family responsibilities, nationality, or disability engage the WFA's protections.

4. Constructive dismissal — where the employer breaches an essential term of the contract, making continued employment untenable.

What this means in practice: most terminations in Singapore are perfectly lawful. A smaller category are wrongful in the strict statutory sense. A further category — distinct from wrongful dismissal — is challengeable on discrimination grounds even if the termination itself was procedurally clean. These are three different things, and conflating them is where most confusion arises.

The Four Typical Termination Scenarios and How the Law Handles Each

Scenario 1: Performance-based termination
Performance management and redundancy restructuring are not automatically wrongful. An employer who terminates an employee for poor performance must be able to demonstrate that the performance concerns were genuine, that the employee was given a reasonable opportunity to respond, and that the decision was not motivated by a protected characteristic. Without a proper paper trail, what looks like a performance dismissal can drift into wrongful territory — particularly where the WFA's protections are engaged.

Scenario 2: Misconduct and summary dismissal
The Employment Act permits summary dismissal without notice only where the employee is guilty of "gross misconduct." What constitutes gross misconduct is defined both in the contract and in the case law. The employer must conduct a reasonable investigation — this is not optional. Termination without investigation, or termination for misconduct that a reasonable employer would not have regarded as gross, is vulnerable to a wrongful dismissal claim.

Scenario 3: Resignation framed as dismissal
Employers who want to remove a difficult employee sometimes create conditions that push the employee to resign. If the employee can demonstrate that the employer's conduct made continued employment intolerable — a fundamental breach of the employment contract — this constitutes constructive dismissal and is treated as wrongful termination. This area is heavily fact-specific, and the case law is detailed.

Scenario 4: Discriminatory termination
The Workplace Fairness Act codifies protected characteristics that previously lived in the Tripartite Guidelines administered by TAFEP. The shift from guidelines to statute is significant: it introduces codified protected characteristics, mandatory grievance procedures, and a defined route to the Employment Claims Tribunals for discrimination-based claims. From a compliance standpoint, it transforms what was previously a conciliation-level concern into a statutory one with defined remedies.

Photo by Yan Krukau on Pexels

Remedies and the Employment Claims Tribunals Route

Employees who believe they have been wrongfully dismissed may bring a claim to the Employment Claims Tribunals (ECT), which sits within the Tripartite Alliance for Dispute Management (TADM) framework. Before filing at the ECT, most claims must first go through mediation at TADM. The process is designed to be accessible — legal representation is not required at the initial stages — but the substantive legal arguments that succeed at the ECT are complex enough that legal advice from an employment lawyer Singapore is typically warranted.

Remedies available through the ECT for wrongful dismissal include:

• Financial compensation for loss of wages and other benefits
• Direct reinstatement (which most employees prefer and which the ECT can order)
• Contributions to CPF where employer's obligations were not met

The limitation period to file is strict — generally within one month of the termination. Missing that window requires a court-approved extension, which is not automatically granted.

Employer Compliance Checklist: Where the Risk Lives

For HR managers and in-house counsel, the WFA's implementation has shifted the compliance priority from TAFEP-level guidance to statutory obligation. The practical checklist includes:

• Review all termination documentation for alignment with WFA protected characteristics
• Audit grievance procedures to ensure they meet the mandatory standard
• Train managers and supervisors on what constitutes a discriminatory ground under the Act
• Update employment contracts to reflect current notice requirements and misconduct definitions
• Review redundancy processes for procedural fairness and consistency

Quahe Woo & Palmer LLC has extensive experience advising employers on these matters. Directors Lawrence Quahe and Christopher Woo lead the firm's Employment Law practice, with Recognitions across Chambers Asia-Pacific, Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, and The Straits Times' Singapore's Best Law Firms 2023.

FAQ

Can an employer dismiss an employee without cause in Singapore?
Singapore does not have a "without cause" termination doctrine. Employers may terminate on grounds of redundancy, performance, or misconduct provided they follow the contractual and statutory requirements. A termination that is procedurally flawed — particularly on notice or investigation — is wrongful even if the underlying reason was legitimate.

What is the difference between wrongful dismissal and unfair dismissal?
Wrongful dismissal is a statutory concept under the Employment Act (notice and misconduct). Unfair dismissal in the Singapore context is primarily a WFA concept — discrimination on a protected ground. The remedies and forums differ, so identifying which category a termination falls into is the first step in assessing options.

Does the Workplace Fairness Act apply to all employers?
The WFA applies to all employers covered by the Employment Act, with certain provisions extending to additional categories. The definition of "employee" and the specific operative dates for different provisions are technical — your employment lawyer Singapore can confirm your specific obligations.

For employees facing a potential or actual termination, and for employers managing a complex or sensitive exit, early legal advice makes a material difference to the outcome. Quahe Woo & Palmer LLC (UEN 200911430C) advises on wrongful dismissal claims, employer compliance, and all aspects of Singapore employment law from offices at 510 Thomson Road, #08-00 SLF Building, Singapore 298135. Contact the firm at [email protected] or +65 6622 0366, or request a confidential consultation online.